On September 27, a catastrophic incident unfolded in the Baltic Sea, where the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, crucial conduits for natural gas from Russia to Europe, suffered extensive damageThis event has sent tremors through the capital markets and sparked concerns of a potential energy crisis reminiscent of the European debt fiasco of 2012. Given the lack of fiscal unity among Eurozone members, how can the European Central Bank (ECB) intervene effectively to stabilize the faltering market? Coupled with the Federal Reserve's tightening monetary policy, the prospect of a financial catastrophe haunting Europe looms larger than ever.

The ongoing strength of the U.Sdollar adds another layer of complexityVulnerable economies are increasingly at risk of crisisA tipping point akin to the "last straw" for an overloaded camel could trigger a sudden financial meltdownEconomists describe this phenomenon as exhibiting classic non-linear characteristics within financial markets, where small changes can lead to significant consequences.

Global liquidity tightening, capital easily withdrawn.

Emerging economies like Turkey, Argentina, South Africa, and Indonesia may face looming currency crises.

Financial crises typically becoming evident through various troubling indicators suggest severe instability, such as bank runs, widespread bankruptcies within financial institutions, stock market crashes, currency devaluation, and increasing debt servicing difficulties

Historical precedents, such as the swift economic growth of East Asia in the 1980s and 1990s, turned into the Southeast Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s when capital began fleeing upon the strengthening of the dollar, demonstrate how quickly the tide can turn.

It is undeniable that the Federal Reserve's monetary tightening introduces a degree of destabilization within the global financial systemHowever, the occurrence of a financial crisis in an economy also hinges on understanding the internal structures of that economy—analyzing factors such as exchange rates, debts, and stock market positions is critical for effective assessment.

The world’s premier traded currencies—the U.Sdollar, euro, British pound, Japanese yen, and the Chinese yuan—are somewhat insulated from currency crises due to their access to robust tools designed to stabilize foreign exchange market fluctuations

• Energy Crisis Meets Fed's Monetary Tightening
• Global Stock Markets Surge: Will A-Shares Follow?
• U.S. Inflation Nearing Its Peak
• Kunlun Wanwei's AI Ambitions and Hurdles
• Battery Firm Targets $1B Off-Road EV Market

However, smaller developed economies like South Korea, along with larger developing economies with freely fluctuating currencies such as India, Brazil, South Africa, Russia, Argentina, Mexico, Turkey, Thailand, and Vietnam, face daunting vulnerabilitiesThey lack the necessary tools and power to contain extreme market volatility if a foreign exchange crisis were to materialize.

When considering short-term debts, nations like Turkey, Argentina, South Africa, Indonesia, Mexico, and Vietnam face significant pressureNotably, most of these countries have been trade deficit countries, with the exception of 2020. The combination of high external debts and the resilience of the U.Sdollar suggests that a currency crisis looms with a high probability for these economiesCurrent inflation rates present alarming figures—Turkey's inflation stands at approximately 80%, with Argentina at 78.5%, teetering on the brink of collapse.

From “lender of last resort” to “buyer of last resort.”

Why aren’t investors worried about potential crises in Japan and the U.S.?

The increase in interest rates undoubtedly places added pressure on the real estate, stock, and bond markets

Nevertheless, since central banks like the Federal Reserve and Japan's central bank have transitioned from being mere "lenders of last resort" to actively participating as the ultimate "buyers" in the market, such concerns may seem overly cautiousFor instance, Japan has resorted to aggressive measures, such as cutting interest rates and implementing radical quantitative easing, and even occupying a formidable role as a trader within its own market.

By November 2020, the Bank of Japan became the largest stakeholder in the Japanese stock market, surpassing even the government’s pension fund, managing an estimated $430 billion in holdingsAs a powerful market player, the central bank's active purchasing efforts significantly buoyed Japan’s stock market, which recorded one of the highest gains globally in 2020, soaring by 45% despite the rampant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The robustness of Japan's debt structure is evident, with nearly 46.8% of its government bonds held by the central bank, leaving only 7.6% in the hands of overseas investors

This substantial control shields the market from potential volatility that foreign investors might stoke, as the overwhelming majority of investments rest with domestic institutions and individuals.

Crucially, when financial markets face risks, the Bank of Japan is poised to swiftly intervene, providing virtually unlimited liquidity whenever neededDrawing from past crises, such as the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008, the Federal Reserve implemented extensive quantitative easing measuresWhen the COVID-19 pandemic struck in 2020, inducing rapid downturns in economic activity and a panic-stricken financial market, the Fed promptly followed suit as an active market participantThis protective layer ensured that, following a brief adjustment, the U.Sstock market continued to reach unprecedented highs, showing little sign of the pandemic's economic destruction.

This success, however, led to swollen balance sheets at the Federal Reserve, which expanded its base monetary supply from $822.9 billion in 2007 to an astonishing $6.4 trillion by the end of 2021—an increase of nearly eightfold.

Investors are seemingly comfortable in the knowledge that liquidity can be restored at will should a crisis arise

Thus, despite the escalating yields on 10-year U.STreasury bonds and the accompanying corrections in the stock market, investor sentiment remains steady.

With central banks providing a safety net, who will worry about another financial crisis?

However, the fundamental question remains: If central banks can simply print money to eliminate financial crises, why have they adhered to the “lender of last resort” concept since their inception? There is a cautionary adage in economics that "every remedy carries its own toxins." As the Bank of Japan began purchasing stock, market flexibility diminished accordingly.

Should central banks continue flooding the market with liquidity, the creditworthiness of the U.Sdollar and yen could erode over timeShould this erosion reach a pivotal tipping point, the potential for a catastrophic collapse arises, leaving us helpless in the face of faltering credit systems

Fortunately, that moment seems far off, primarily because no alternative currencies currently exist to replace them.

War conflicts disrupt European supply chains.

Energy crises are catalyzing multinational companies to exit Europe.

While the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan have employed transformative strategies to stabilize their markets, the European Central Bank is equally capable of undertaking similar maneuvers, particularly as its historical operations have often mirrored those of the Fed.

However, the ongoing war has triggered an energy crisis across Europe and fueled a rise in far-right political sentiment within the continentThe victory of Italy's Brothers of Italy party exemplifies how these conflicts unveil the vulnerabilities of the European project—chief among them being the lack of fiscal unity within the Eurozone, which raises pressing questions surrounding the ECB's ability to provide support to struggling markets

Are we on the precipice of a repeat of the 2012 Eurozone debt crisis?

As if navigating these turbulent waters wasn’t enough, September 27 marked a key milestone when the Nord Stream pipelines connecting Russia and Europe sustained severe damageCurrent assessments suggest that repairs may take over a monthConsequently, Europe faces the harsh reality of potentially facing a winter devoid of Russian gas supplies.

In order to ensure gas supply for households, significant segments of industrial production may have to haltEurope’s energy consumption structure reveals a stark reality regarding its reliance on Russian energy, which instills fear concerning the coming winter seasonIn 2021, oil accounted for 33.47% and natural gas for 24.95% of Europe’s total energy consumption, with both sources combined amounting to over 58%. Apart from Norway and the Netherlands, most of Europe imports oil and gas, with nearly 30% of oil and 33% of natural gas sourced from Russia.

The greatest fallout from ongoing conflicts has struck at the heart of Europe’s supply chains

Europe boasts significant comparative advantages in medium-to-high-end manufacturingYet these industries depend heavily on raw materials and energy—principally supplied by Russia due to geographical proximity and low transportation costsAs the conflict persists alongside pipeline damage, the shortage of energy will drive numerous multinational firms to relocate from EuropeHistorical precedence, much like the Southeast Asian financial crisis of 1997, forced numerous businesses from the “Four Asian Tigers” to move operations to the relatively safer currency environment of China.

When contemplating the three major global supply chains—Europe, East Asia, and North America—the East Asian supply chain appears less impacted given its continued access to Russian energy supplies, while North America benefits as a net exporter of natural gas and oil, witnessing augmented revenues despite rising costs

Conversely, Europe faces dire circumstances regarding energy shortages, which could lead to widespread industrial shutdownsNotably, aluminum giant Hydro has proclaimed that, due to energy challenges, it will completely shut down all its smelting operations in Slovakia after SeptemberSimilarly, Germany's LechSteel has announced indefinite halts in production.

Central banks cannot simply print money without consequences—a core vulnerability for Europe.

Interest rate hikes amplify government debts and inhibit economic vibrancy.

In high-leverage, high-inflation scenarios, financial markets emerge as delicate systems, susceptible to rapid contagion through panic that could result in liquidity shortagesThe specters of the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis and the 2012 European debt crisis linger in every investor’s memory

However, post-Eurozone crisis, the trend has seen most economies, with the exception of Ireland, steadily increasing their leverage ratios, often reaching new heights—Italy stands out with an ever-climbing government leverage ratio.

In light of the Eurozone debt crisis aftermath, reformations took precedence in 2012, resulting in the establishment of the European Financial Stability Mechanism and the European Financial Stability Fund, designed to support member states financially and safeguard European financial stability.

The transition of central banks from being “lenders of last resort” to “buyers of last resort” parallels a necessity for “monetary finance,” or Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), as central banks cannot simply print money without matching liabilities—every asset corresponds to each liabilityThe ECB’s willingness to intervene hinges on synchronous fiscal cooperation.

Before the Eurozone debt crisis erupted, despite the establishment of the Eurozone, fiscal policy remained at the discretion of individual member countries

This scenario manifested in countries like Italy, where newly elected prime ministers expanded deficits to boost welfare without immediate benefits for their constituencyWhen economic downturns ensued, they had to depend on borrowing from fellow member states to cover shortfallsNaturally, more frugal economies balked at the notion of subsidizing fiscal imprudenceThe political climate dissuaded leaders from using their citizens’ taxes to finance other countries' debts.

Following the 2012 Eurozone crisis, other major economies in the Eurozone, such as Germany and France, were placed in a paradoxical situation—while they needed to provide assistance, they imposed fiscal discipline as conditionality upon supporting distressed economies, insisting on avoiding financially reckless behaviors.

Looking back over the last decade of governmental leverage rates, it seems that the imposed constraints lack efficacy

Yet, now with an energy crisis escalating, the pressure to implement rate hikes to combat inflation looms largeThe energy crisis will inherently curtail economic growth, while tighter monetary policies raise bond yields, intensifying government repayment challengesConsequently, this dual-layer effect poses a risk of reigniting a debt crisis at any given time.

However, should such a scenario be realized, the rescue process may prove far more complex than in previous incidentsWith the rise of far-right governance in nations like Italy, who would be willing to extend aid to a perceived antagonist amidst the ongoing "pro-Europe" versus "anti-Europe" debates?

Thus, as the far-right movements gain traction within European nations, catalyzed by war and energy crises, Europe’s economy could trend towards “stagflation,” alongside a weakening euroConcurrently, several governments burdened by high debts may spiral into financial crises, leading Europe into an ever-worsening financial quagmire.